TCM Systemic Healthcare Engineering 中醫系統養生工程學 – Chinese New year 農曆新年

image


Wishes of Chinese new year: 猴年新春
Healthcare successful!
養生成功
physically strong
修身健康
emotionally happy
修心受樂
mentally kind
慈悲養性
behaviorally charitable
修行為善
spiritually enlightened
正見靈修

http://www.yinyangbalance.asia/blog/?p=2282  [English]

一年之計在於春,一日之計在於晨。中國人在農曆新年都會在心裡默默許願,盼望擁有美好的將來,也會在口中說出美好的祝願。就讓我們看看怎樣才是美好,又怎樣才可以達成願望!

衣食住行是我們身體生存的必須條件。告子在《孟子·告子上》說“食、色,性也”,意思是

食慾和性慾都是人的本性,是與生俱來的內心衝動。本性的“食” 是保證自己肉體在時間流的繼續存在。本性的“色”是繼而保證自己的家庭,民族,種族在時間流中的繼續存在。要有較穩定的延續,就要有較好的衣食住行。 一般跟以下的傳統語句有關:

豐衣足食《戰國策。秦策五》
安居樂業
行動方便
交通方便
四通八達
朝發暮至《後漢書。烏桓傳》

這種“喜愛”引發起確保有效率的延續方法之研究 修身。中醫對生命的保養稱之為“養生”(Healthcare),其中一方面就是保養身體,我們在這裡嘗試以佛陀的五蘊系統把修身歸入色蘊部分。我們把其分為三部秘笈。

第一部秘笈是食療養生,包括如何足食之技巧。其精髓在於對食物的寒涼平溫熱及表里補瀉之分類,從而再推至藥食同源的普及化層靣。只要於中醫之“三維表里寒熱虛實系統“中, “辯證“出身體現在處於的坐標(體質),就可以進行中醫養生食療。

要行動方便、交通方便、四通八達就要有好的身體活動能力。所以第二部分的中醫養生秘笈是“運動養生-中庸功“,這包括由中國國髓太極拳中精煉出來,去除技擊部分而剩下的二十一式運動,能夠令全身每一個關節都得到適當的鍛練,從而加速疼痛症狀及其它疾病的修復。

處理完“食“ 的胃部衝動問題後就是“色“的性器官衝動問題。 狹義的“色”是指性器官的“喜愛”衝動所引起的心之情緒衝動,繼而引起的性行為。廣義一點是指腦袋思維上對家庭,民族及種族的“喜愛”衝動所引起的心之情緒衝動,繼而引起的性行為。這種“喜愛”引發了有效率的延續方法齊家、治國、平天下。這些養生方法包括在第三部秘笈裏面的“生活養生“。

這些衝動的“愛慾”都引發了行為上的“取得”。佛陀教導的十二因緣中有指出之不良種子。而老子曰: 禍莫大於不知足,咎莫大於欲得,故知足之足,常足矣!

所以修身的下一步是修心养性。 我們在這裡嘗試以佛陀的五蘊系統把修心歸類為心情而入受蘊部分,而把養性歸類為性格而入想蘊部分 。

修心的成就應為

受負面情緒之出現而心動,繼而誤入惡性循環中。並應時時向正能量之心情專注,慢慢心中自然只剩下喜及樂之感受。

養性是要改善我們性格上的慣性愛惡。破除憎人富貴厭人窮為求成功,不擇手段我有我去感受,懶理你的感受、等等不良愛惡,而去學習發展對慈悲喜舍的偏愛,及對貪嗔癡的偏惡。 慈悲喜舍應可以簡單理解為不求回報的愛、對老弱的憐憫、對喜悅的共享、及對人事現實的接受。

修行是行為上之養生,我們在這裡嘗試以佛陀的五蘊系統把修行歸入行蘊部分。佛陀把行蘊分為身口意三業(做了的行為),即以身體影響他人,以語言出口影響他人,及以意念影響他人(腦電波或氣場?)。佛陀曾教導

以小善而不為,不以小惡而為之。所以修行應以擇善而為之。這樣才可以一團和氣。世界衛生組織對健康的定義指向三方面,分別為身體健康,心理健康及社交健康

靈修為先天命格之養生,我們在這裡嘗試以佛陀的五蘊系統把靈修歸入識蘊部分。這裡必須以佛陀所留給我們的基礎教導四聖諦,尤其是其中的八正道中 之正見正思維作為指導。簡單地介紹,是要從人生不如意事十常八九,或從身體的生老病死中領悟之真相。要從身外之事物及相應的心中之情緒,及身體之感受的變幻莫測中領悟無常之真相。並要從修行中學習以幫助他人為己任的自我犧牲行為中領悟無我的真相。再簡而言之,就是活在當下(覺知),樂天知命,接受現實(舍心),努力生活(正命),尊重別人(隨喜),愛護老幼 (慈悲)

待续。。。

養生及修行打坐是大學問,在這裡只能作簡略介紹,大家應當向老師、儒釋道大師及中醫師等專業人士好好請教學習。

再祝大家:養生成功!
笑口常開,學業進步,福星高照,老少平安,快高長大,心想事成,出入平安,四季平安,天增歲月人增夀,一團和氣,常常喜樂,青春常駐,食得是福,人強馬壯,五福臨門,冏冏有神,新年快樂,聰明伶俐,紅光滿面,迎春接福,得心應手,武藝超群,風生水起。。。

image

References 参考文献:

Comparison of four different systems theory
A. Five Aggregate Human Mind System (Buddha) 五蕴系统
B. Traditional Chinese Medicine Healthcare (Tomas)
C. Participatory action research (John Kineman & Rosen)
D. DSRP Systems Thinking (Derek Cabrera)

sub-system 1
A. 色 Physical
B. Physical Healthcare
C. Whole
D. Systems Part-Whole

sub-system 2
A. 識 Observation
B. Spiritual Healthcare
C. Observe
D. Perspectives Point-View

sub-system 3
A. 想 Recognition
B. Mental Healthcare
C. Reflect (meaning, goal, exemplar)
D. Distinctions Identity-Other

sub-system 4
A. 受 Sensation
B. Emotional Healthcare
C. Plan (intention, design, attractor)
D. Mental systems Metacondition-Analysis

sub-system 5
A. 行 Reaction
B. Behavioural Healthcare
C. Act (action,practice,dynamics)
D. Relationships Acton-Reaction

C. Participatory action research. Anticipatory system
1-observe (object,result,condition)
2-act (action,practice,dynamics)
3-plan (intention, design, attractor)
4-reflect (meaning, goal, exemplar)
5-whole

D. DSRP systems thinking
Sub-system (Yin-Yang)
Mental systems (Metacondition-Analysis)
Perspectives (Point-View)
Relationships (Acton-Reaction)
Systems (Part-Whole)
Distinctions (Identity-Other)

 

 

發自 from 黃炎 E C

Only the Karma that follows 萬般帶不走,唯有業隨身。

一日無常到,方知夢裏人.
萬般帶不走,唯有業隨身。

One day when impermanence arises,
only then does one realize the life is a dream.
Nothing can be taken away,
only the Karma that follows.

不同文化的共同金科玉律:儒家的「己所不欲,勿施於人」A common Golden Rule across different cultures, the Confucius: Do not do to others what you would not like yourself.

The Golden Rule 金科玉律:
Confucius 儒家: Sinology Confucianism, the Analects of Confucius.
子貢問曰:「有一言而可以終身行之者乎?」
子曰:「其恕乎!己所不欲,勿施於人。」 —— 《論語·衛靈公》
Do not do to others what you would not like yourself.

Buddhism 釋家:
Udanavarga 5:18 Priyavarga 《法集要頌經》愛樂品第5.18
徧於諸方求 令心中間察
頗有斯等類 不愛乃愛彼
以己喩彼命 是故不害人
5. AGREEABLE THINGS.
18. Look where you will, there is nothing dearer to man than himself; therefore, as it is the same thing that is dear to you and to others, hurt not others with what pains yourself.

Christianity:
Do Unto others as you would have them do unto you.

Hinduism:
Treat others as you would yourself be treated.

Islam:
Do unto all men as you would wish to have done unto you.

Judaism:
What you yourself hate, do to no man.

Native Americian:
Live in harmony, for we are all related.

Sacred Earth:
Do as you will, as long as you harm no one

Zoroastrianism:
Whatever is disagreeable to yourself, do not do to others.

The list keep going on and on… 
https://translate.google.com.hk/translate?hl=zh-TW&sl=en&tl=zh-TW&u=http%3A%2F%2Fbessel.org%2Fgolden.htm&anno=2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Protected: Editing 寫作中: 老子「寵辱若驚」之讚美性思想與批判性思想 Taoism’s view on Productive Praise and Constructive Criticism

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

元宵節如意,圓滿,知足常樂。日出美,日落亦美。 Happy Chinese Valentine’s day

image

image

元宵節祝願大家如意,圓滿,快樂。繼而在今年的人生起起落落中也能開心面對,知足常樂。日出美,日落亦美,變化而已,悟則常樂。Happy Chinese Valentine’s day (first full moon of the first Chinese month). May everything be complete and everyone be content. Both sunrise and sunset are beautiful, realizing that these are all just changes will bring you happiness all the times, ups or downs during this year ^o^

發自 from 黃炎 E C

System Basics Workshop: From System Basics to Anthropocene – the perspective of Traditional Chinese Medicine and that of the teaching of Buddha.

Papernumber: 2428

Tomas, E C Yan HUANG
Causeway Bay, HK, Hong Kong.
http://www.yinyangbalance.asia/

Sunday 2015.Aug.02 System Basics workshop full day at ISSS2015 conference at Berlin, Germany http://isss.org/world/Programme

image

Anthropocene is becoming more and more important as the balance shifts more and more towards the human side of the nature-human spectrum. The whole environment(nature)-system(human) Yin-Yang relationship has reversed to become a system(nature)-environment(human) Yin-Yang relationship.

In this Anthropocene age, determination of the sustainable balancing point is one of the challenging tasks. The interaction between different systems forms the balancing point between any one of the systems and its corresponding environment. Each system holds onto its own perspectives (rights and freedom) and at the same time adapts (respect and obey) to the perspectives of other systems. Therefore, it is about the balance between the nature-human Yin spectrum and the adaptation-freedom Yang spectrum.

Human would naturally pursue for the freedom side of the Yang spectrum, however, this will push the Yin spectrum to the human side developing a very imbalanced system. Such system would get into a turbulent stage before the balancing point between new systems and environments is settled, which could be disastrous to human.
The balance between the two spectrums would mean certain sacrifice to the freedom of human. However, would there be another way out of this sacrifice? Human take nature for granted but without fully understanding the sub-systems in nature on which we have been relying. However,could human develop the knowledge and wisdom to re-create a nature that would support the survival of our physical body and at the same time satisfy the unlimited needs for freedom by human? This is the second challenge in this Anthropocene age, Governing the Anthropocene.

In this workshop we will start from the system basics of the Taichi Yin-Yang system theory in Traditional Chinese Medicine, and the Five systems theory in the teaching of Buddha, with a view to gradually building up the systemic views to understand and analyze the Governing of Anthropocene.

The systemic thinking of the unification of nature and man has been the fundamental concept in traditional Chinese culture since around 500BC. The concept is also embedded in the teaching of Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism, and Traditional Chinese Medicine. The traditional Chinese system theories under investigation include the Taichi yin-yang system theory, the Five systems theory of the human mind, and the Traditional Chinese Medicine differential diagnosis-cure process. These theories are found to be related to different modern system theories compared including Viable system model.

Taichi yin-yang system theory describes the relationship between any two entities (element/process) at any level of interest. It concerns the quantitative and qualitative changes between the entities. This is related to causal loop diagram (CLD) in system dynamics which uses reinforcing loop and balancing loop. The observer is not specified in the theories, but the perspectives of the observer actually determine the entities, the unit of quantitative changes, and the ratio of qualitative changes.

The Five systems theory of the human mind is one of the important concepts developed in the teaching of Buddha. The Five systems are: awareness, perspective, sensation, action and physical object. These five systems are able to describe the properties of the observer and the decision maker.

The Traditional Chinese Medicine differential diagnosis-cure process is a practical systemic process that has been used daily for more than 2000 years. It is believed that the whole macroscopic-microscopic spectrum of systems is suitable. The system state identification involves three pairs of direction-forming spectrums. The Superficial and Internal spectrum gathers information between the boundary and the system. The Cold and Hot spectrum gathers information between the form and function, or matter and energy within the system. The Deficient and Excess spectrum gathers information between the environment and the system. Strategy can then be formulated to regulate and maintain the system.

Keywords: Anthropocene, Buddhism, Causal loop diagram CLD, Confucianism, Five systems of human mind, General System Theory, Health and system thinking, quantitative and qualitative changes, Spirituality and Systems, System dynamics, Taichi Yin-Yang System Theory, Taoism, Buddha’s teaching, Traditional Chinese Medicine differential diagnosis-cure process, Unification of nature and man, Viable system model VSM. |
Supporting Agencies: Ancient Balance Medicine Research and Education Fund Foundation Ltd.

發自 from 黃炎 E C

你我他的觀點與角度 – 化解衝突的方法與代價 Your Perspective, My Perspective, Their Perspective. Conflicts Resolution and Opportunity Cost

你我他的觀點與角度
Your Perspective, My Perspective, Their Perspective.


圖片:互聯網

  (English version on bottom)

IQ題目1

 <–*–*–*–>
-2 -1 0 1 2

問:中間數是?

有高人答:0,完美無瑕!

 IQ題目2

 <–*–*–*–*–>
1 2 3 4 5 6

問:中間數是?
有高人答:只有左右,沒有中間!
有高人答:有左有右!
有高人答:不三不四!

數學上觀點不同(-22 16),
其平衡點也不同(0 34)。

IQ題目3

<–*–*–*–>
-∞     ?     ∞

 如果觀點是完全宏觀,包羅萬有,-∞到∞每一點都是對的,怎樣平衡?宏觀才是最客觀?還是每一點都不重要才最客觀?

 

主觀與客觀
Subjective and 
Objective 

我們以為主觀是相對正確的,客觀才是絕對正確的。但從這幾個例子看來,主觀的觀點才是絕對不變,反而客觀地綜合多個觀點才是相對的,在變化的!到底是客觀會找到答案呢?還是主觀才會得到答案?

 

科學家希望把有爭議性的哲學與絕對準確的數學分隔開來。但看來數學還是逃不過不同觀點的爭議!我們會否一直過分迷信科學可以解決我們的問題?但事實上,科學也跳不出有爭議性的哲學範疇。到底真理是“凡事都可以黑白分明,而灰色只是誤解?”還是真理是“凡事本來都是灰色,是我們人類硬要黑白分明?

 

Conflicts 衝突

圖片:互聯網

EQ 題目:你愛不三不四,我愛完美無瑕,怎辦?

本來最好的解決方案應該是各自各精彩,但却有不能避免的接觸或要活在同一屋簷下,有共同擁有的財產和跟隨者。怎辦?

 

 Conflicts Resolution 化解衝突

  1. 以“愛Love”來求大同存小異:“一百個人有一百個觀點,但又能和諧共處”。因為大家都是一家人,要和平相處。“家是一個講愛的地方,不是講理的地方”。
  1. 以“理Reasoning”來理性討論:標榜自己的觀點,以取得對方與中立者的支持。討論可以用不同的語言語調,但一定要保持和平。
  1. 以“執著Stubborn”來破壞和平,進行分裂,仇恨與戰爭:奪取中立與對方的支持者及其財產。

Levels of War 戰爭的層次

  1. 駡戰 – Flaming war

  • 參考香港互聯網定義:罵戰雙方網民完全不講規矩和理性,經常互扣帽子,互相吵架,以令對方蒙羞為目的。有些網民樂於以食花生的心態觀看罵戰,有些網民則會間中發帖抽水一番。罵戰多數不能達成任何共識或說服任何人,相反只會加深雙方的仇恨。http://evchk.wikia.com/wiki/%E7%BD%B5%E6%88%B0
  • 參考佛陀所指,我們脫離痛苦的第一步是要好好自律保護自己:第四戒是戒妄語。妄語包括:
    • 謊言(顛倒是非,是說成不是,不是說成是)
    • 誇大(五十說成七十或說成三十)
    • 兩舌(搬弄是非,對某人如此說,對另一人又那般說)
    • 惡口(罵人、毀謗中傷人)
    • 綺語(有動機、有私心地說好話,或說無用的廢話)
    • http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%BA%94%E6%88%92
  • 應該多參考其他聖人的言行。

  • 代價:信任,名譽,和諧,和平。。。
  1. 經濟戰 – Economic war

  • 阻礙對方的經濟活動與資訊科技
  • 禁止對方的經濟活動與資訊科技
  • 破壞對方的經濟活動與資訊科技
  • 毀滅對方的經濟活動與資訊科技
  • 參考佛陀第二戒:戒盜
  • 應該多參考其他聖人的言行。
  • 代價:首當其衝是大家的休息與興趣,繼而是吃喝玩樂,最後衣食住行也不能倖免!還有。。。
  1. 肉體戰 – Physical war

  • 以自己的身體阻礙對方的身體活動
  • 以自己的身體禁止對方的身體活動
  • 以自己的身體破壞對方的身體活動
  • 參考佛陀第一戒:戒殺
  • 應該多參考其他聖人的言行。
  • 代價:首先是身體的健康,繼而是心理的健康。。。
  1. 殺戮戰 – Killing war

  • 以武器破壞對方的身體
  • 代價:被殺害的恐懼。。。
  1. 滅族戰 – Total annihilation

  • 以武器毀滅對方的身體
  • 代價:心中會被其他種族、政族滅族之恐懼。。。

 

Current situation in Hong Kong
現在香港情況

  • Flaming war 駡戰已經開始多年,
  • Economic war 2014.09月經濟戰開始,
  • Physical war 2014.10月肉體戰已經開始!

 

Possible solution
現在香港人應該怎麼走?

認清代價,真實負責。

為達到自己的願望、爭取支持者、利益及財產,所須付的代價到底要對方、社會、自己走到那一個層次的分裂戰爭呢?經濟學明確指出,做任何一件事都有代價(opportunity cost)。多大的回報才是值得,也是一個主觀與客觀的問題。但最重要是要清楚代價是什麼!

還要知道,雖然財產是有客觀的價值,但還有許多不同的事物都是無價的,例如親人、朋友、和諧、信任、自由與穩定。當一個無價的願望需要付出不同的無價之代價,數學已經不管用了!做了客觀的分析後,還是要做一個主觀的決定,然後付諸實行。最後更要向自己、對方與社會支持者,負上其“行動”、“抽水”、“中立”、“食花生”或“反行動”所帶來的責任。

每個香港人自己來選擇吧!和平與戰爭!互愛與仇恨!

“愛Love” 《-》“理Reasoning” 《-》“執著Stubborn”

 願大家
放下心結,健康快樂。

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/ECbalance
Hong Kong 928 protest: From peace to civil economic war
香港928游行: 由和平演變到經濟內戰

Your Perspective, My Perspective, Their Perspective. Conflicts Resolution and Opportunity Cost

—–你我他的觀點與角度
—–Your Perspective, My Perspective, Their Perspective.

IQ Quest #1: 
<–*–*–*–>
-2 -1 0 1 2
Q: Where is the middle point?
A: 0, perfection!

IQ Quest #2: 
<–*–*–*–*–>
1 2 3 4 5 6
Q: Where is the middel point?
A1: There is only left and right, there is no middle!
A2: There are both left and right!
A3: Whatever!

-From the above mathematics examples, we can see that the balance point (0 and 3 or 4) depends on the frame of reference/ point of view (-2 to 2 or 1 to 6).

IQ Quest #3:
<–*–*–*–>
-∞     ?     ∞ 

-If we take a macroscopic point of vew to include the whole spectrum from -∞ to ∞, and every single point is of equal importance. Then what is the balance point with this point of view or perspective?

-Is macroscopic view the most objective view? Or the most objective view is to pay no importance to any of the points?

—–主觀與客觀Subjective and Objective 

-It is believed that being subjective is only relatively correct, while being objective is absolutely correct. However, from the above examples, the subjective perspective is the one that is absolute without change, while trying to take a balance between different perspectives is the one the is relative subject to change when different balancing strategies are selected. So the answer could be found in objectiveness, or only subjectiveness could provide an absolute answer?

-Scientists has been trying to seperate the disputable philosophy from the precise mathematics. However, it seem that mathematics still cannot escape the dispute of different perspectives! Have we been blindly believe that modern science can solve all our problems? While the fact is that science still cannot escape the boundary of the disputable philosophy. Is it the truth that everything can be clearly defined as black or white, and grey area is only a misconception? Or is is the truth that everything is grey, and it is us the human that forcefully define the blace and white.

—–Conflicts 衝突

EQ Question: You want whatever, I love perfection, what should we do?
-The best answer is that everyone should enjoy themselves. However, sometimes contact between us is unavoidable because we are living under that same roof, we have common assect and common supporters. What should we do?

—–Conflicts Resolution 化解衝突

A. Use “Love” to resolve the differences: “In the midst of one hundred different voices expressed by one hundred persons, harmony can still be struck.” We should live in harmony with each other, because we all belong to the same family. “Family is a place for love rather than a place for reasoning”

B. Use “Reasoning” to have reasonable agruements: To sell one’s prespective in order to gain the supporters of the opposition and the neutral. Different language and tones could be employed but peace must be maintained.

F. Use “Stubborn” to destroy the peace, to divide, causing hatred and war: to fight for the supporters and properties of the neutrality and the oppositions.
         

Levels of War 戰爭的層次

1. 駡戰 – Flaming war

-Internet: Flaming is a hostile and insulting interaction betweenInternet users, often involving the use of profanity.Flaming usually occurs in the social context of an Internet forum, Internet Relay Chat (IRC), Usenet, by e-mail, game servers such as Xbox Live or PlayStation Network, and onvideo-sharing websites. It is frequently the result of the discussion of heated real-world issues such as politics,religion, and philosophy, or of issues that polarize sub-populations, but can also be provoked by seemingly trivial differences.Deliberate flaming, as opposed to flaming as a result of emotional discussions, is carried out by individuals known asflamers, who are specifically motivated to incite flaming. These users specialize in flaming and target specific aspects of a controversial conversation. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flaming_(Internet)

-During a Flaming, there will be audience enjoy watching and there will also be people taking advantage of the war.

-We can make a reference to the teaching of Buddha that taught us how to escape from dissatisfaction. The first step is self protection and the 4th protection is the right speech, purity of vocal action. “To understand what is purity of speech, one must know what is impurity of speech. Speaking lies to deceive others, speaking harsh words that hurt others, backbiting and slanderous talk, babbling and purposeless chatter are all impurities of vocal action. When one abstains from these, what remains is right speech”
http://www.vridhamma.org/The-Discourse-Summaries

-We should make more references to other Saints.

-Opportunity cost: trust, respect, harmony, peace…

2. 經濟戰 – Economic war

-Obstruct the economic acitivities and information technology of the opposition
-Prohibit the economic acitivities and information technology of the opposition
-Damage the economic acitivities and information technology of the opposition
-Destroy the economic acitivities and information technology of the opposition

-Can make a reference to the the second rule of self protection in the teaching of Buddha: abstain from stealing
-We should make more references to other Saints.
-Opportunity cost: Firstly will be our lesire time, play time, our hobby and our rest time. Next will be our basic survival of clothing, food, housing and transportation! More will be…

3. 肉體戰 – Physical war

-using one’s body to obstruct the bodily activity of the opposition
-using one’s body to prohibit the bodily activity of the opposition
-using one’s body to damage the bodily activity of the opposition
-Can make a reference to the the first rule of self protection in the teaching of Buddha: abstain from killing
-We should make more references to other Saints.
-Opportunity cost: Firstly will be the bodily health, then will be the emotional health and mental health…

4. 殺戮戰 – Killing war

-Use of weapons to destroy the body of the opposition
-Opportunity cost: the fear of being killed…

5. 滅族戰 – Total annihilation

-Use of weapons for the total annihilation of the opposition race
-Opportunity cost: the fear of being the target of total annihilation of the other race and political race…

—–Current situation in Hong Kong現在香港情況

Flaming war has started more than a decade ago,
Economic war started in 2014.09,
Physical war started in 2014.10! 

—–Possible solution現在香港人應該怎麼走?

-認清代價,真實負責。
-Clearly identify the opportunity cost, be practically responsible.

-Which level of war are you willing to get yourself, the opposition, and the society into, in order to satisfy your own dreams in gaining supporters, benefits and assets? In economics, opportunity cost exists in whatever way you act. The question of how much return is worthwhile is also a subjective and objective question. The most important point is that one should clearly identify and understand the opportunity cost!

-One should also know that even thought physical assets has a objective mathematical value, there are many other things that are invaluable, which include family, friends, harmony, trust, freedom and stability. When the opportunity cost of a invaluable desire is another invaluable lost, mathematics is of no use anymore. After an objective analysis, one still have to make an subjective decision to perform an action. In the end, one have to be responsible to oneself, the opposition, the supporters and the society for one’s action, being neutral, anti-action, being the audience, or being the advantage taker. Every people have to choose themselves, between peace and war, love and hatred!

“愛Love”
^^^^^vvvvv
“理Reasoning”
^^^^^vvvvv
“執著Stubborn” 

May you untie the knots in your heart, be healthy and happy.

最痛心係…見到身邊的朋友因為立場不同, 先口角,後Unfriend,繼而反面…What hurts me most …. is the complete breakup of friendship ….

A quote from facebook : 以下是從網絡中輯錄,與大家分享 (English version is our own translation)

最令我痛心既事,唔係警察如何清場,唔係示威者如何激進,唔係有無人受傷,更唔係政府和三子有咩回應…

最痛心係…見到身邊的朋友因為立場不同,
先口角,後Unfriend,繼而反面…

我相信…各位身邊總有發生依類事情。
真正民主,係唔止一把聲音,唔止一個政黨。一百個人有一百種聲音,而又和諧。

我希望見到係””互相尊重””…
而唔係””文革批鬥,粗口互相問候…””
而唔係””我係咁架啦,你unfd啦….”
而唔係””離開群組,解散群組…””

朋友間,親人間,
總會有不同的聲音,意見…
請學識如何維持自身立場…
又可以和對手共處…

請和你的對手説””不緊要,我尊重你!””
請和你的對手説””不緊要,我們仍是朋友!””
最後請和你的對手””笑一笑,握握手。””

香港人,一家人…
會否再分裂,再撕裂…
就看大家識唔識””尊重,共存””

If you agree , please repost ( but please don’t take credit for the content )

— 在銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay

What hurts me most …. is the complete breakup of friendship ….最痛心係…見到身邊的朋友因為立場不同, 先口角,後Unfriend,繼而反面…

A quote from facebook : (original in Chinese, English version is our own translation) A If you agree , please re-post ( but please don’t take credit for the content )

[中文版]

What hurts me most arises not from site clearance by the police, nor frenzy aggression of protesters, nor casualties, nor statements by Government and the occupy-central-trio in response …..

What hurts me most …. is when friends take opposing sides, leading to heated arguments, cross-sword challenges, ending in complete breakup of friendship ….

I believe we have all witnessed such hurtful experience around us.

True democracy is not restricted to one voice, one party. In the midst of one hundred different voices expressed by one hundred persons, harmony can still be struck.

I long to see “mutual respect” ….
Rather than “inflicting injuries cultural-revolution-style, with verbal abuse of malicious swearing” …..
Rather than “I am not giving way, I don’t care if we are no longer friends” …..
Rather than “withdrawing from the communal group, or dissolving the communal group”.

Among friends and relatives,
There always will be different voices, dissimilar view points ….
Let us learn how to hold onto our own convictions ….
While co-existing with our opponents under one roof.

Please say to your opponent, “It’s OK, I respect you!”
Please say to your opponent, “It’s OK, we are still friends!”
And finally, please wear a smile and shake hands with your opponent.

People of Hong Kong, we are a family ….
Whether we will again split, and tear each other apart ….
Depends on our embracing or otherwise the value of “respect and co-existence”.

If you agree , please repost ( but please don’t take credit for the content )

最令我痛心既事,唔係警察如何清場,唔係示威者如何激進,唔係有無人受傷,更唔係政府和三子有咩回應…

最痛心係…見到身邊的朋友因為立場不同,
先口角,後Unfriend,繼而反面…

我相信…各位身邊總有發生依類事情。
真正民主,係唔止一把聲音,唔止一個政黨。一百個人有一百種聲音,而又和諧。

我希望見到係””互相尊重””…
而唔係””文革批鬥,粗口互相問候…””
而唔係””我係咁架啦,你unfd啦….”
而唔係””離開群組,解散群組…””

朋友間,親人間,
總會有不同的聲音,意見…
請學識如何維持自身立場…
又可以和對手共處…

請和你的對手説””不緊要,我尊重你!””
請和你的對手説””不緊要,我們仍是朋友!””
最後請和你的對手””笑一笑,握握手。””

香港人,一家人…
會否再分裂,再撕裂…
就看大家識唔識””尊重,共存””

— 在銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay